Global Warming Hoax
The Global Warming Hoax refers to claims that the Scientific Consensus on anthropogenic Global Warming, particularly driven by CO2 Emissions from fossil fuels, is a Fabricated Narrative promoted by organisations like the United Nations to advance economic and political agendas such as Carbon Taxes and GeoEngineering.
History and UN Involvement
Prior to the 1960s, discussions on climate modification focused on geoengineering to warm regions like the Arctic, but research by oceanographer Roger Revelle shifted emphasis to natural CO2 warming, rendering such projects unnecessary. By 1970, no global consensus existed among scientists on Human-Induced Warming. The Disastrous Earth Blog argues that the United Nations has perpetuated this "lie" for nearly 50 years, relying on presumptions rather than evidence to impose carbon penalties funding manipulative technologies. Regional weather variations are allegedly fudged as "global" to sustain the deception, ignoring natural factors like Solar Activity.
The 97% Consensus Myth
A widely cited claim asserts that 97% of Climate Scientists agree humans cause global warming, but this figure is criticised as misleading and methodologically flawed. The Forbes critique reveals that only 1.6% of papers explicitly endorse humans causing over 50% of the observed 0.8°C warming trend over 150 years, with most classifications relying on implicit or unquantified endorsements. Politicians like Barack Obama have equivocated by adding "dangerous" to the claim, justifying anti-fossil fuel policies despite the mild, tapering warming trend.
The underlying Cook et al. (2013) study, which surveyed abstracts for endorsement levels, has been Debunked for misclassifying neutral or skeptical papers. Scientists like Dr. Richard Tol reported that 80% of his included papers were incorrectly rated as endorsements rather than neutral, calling the sampling "nonsense." The Popular Technology analysis documents responses from authors such as Craig Idso, who rejected the "implicit endorsement" label for his CO2 plant growth paper, and Nir Shaviv, whose solar/cosmic ray work was misrepresented as supporting anthropogenic causes.
The following table outlines the hoax's progression.
| Category | Event | Historical Context | Initial Promotion as Science | Emerging Evidence and Sources | Current Status and Impacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus Fabrication | 97% Claim Origin | 1991-2011 paper abstracts reviewed by Cook et al. | Endorsement implied via vague categories | Author protests (Idso, Shaviv, Tol); only 1.6% explicit | Discredited; fuels policy skepticism |
| UN Deception | Geoengineering Shift | Pre-1962 Arctic warming proposals | Revelle's natural CO2 findings twisted | No 1970 consensus; solar data ignored | Carbon taxes fund untested tech; environmental harm |
| Methodological Flaws | Tol's Re-analysis | Web of Science sampling biases | 97% from excluding neutrals | 66% no position; strawman AGW definition | Propaganda over science; low sensitivity confirmed |
| Advocacy Efforts | CEPHRC Fight | Human rights in cyberspace perspective | Policy and legal challenges to scam narrative | CEPHRC publication | Ongoing awareness and human rights advocacy |
Implications
Proponents argue the hoax distracts from natural climate drivers like solar fluctuations and justifies Irreversible GeoEngineering, causing greater Ecological Damage than claimed warming. The Centre for Excellence for Protection of Human Rights in Cyberspace (CEPHRC) has been actively fighting the Global Warming Scam by examining its policy implications and advocating for Human Rights based approaches to environmental narratives, emphasising the need to challenge fabricated and nonsensical Settled Science claims that use Fake Science to infringe on Individual Freedoms. Rejecting the narrative emphasises adopting true Humanity First Goal without catastrophic policies.
References
(1) '97% Of Climate Scientists Agree' Is 100% Wrong
(3) 97% Study Falsely Classifies Scientists' Papers, according to the scientists that published them
(4) UN Blatantly Lied About Global Warming Due To CO2 Emissions By Fossils Fuels
(5) Unmasking The Global Warming Hoax: The Truth Behind The Climate Narrative