CEPHRC

From Truth Revolution Of 2025 By Praveen Dalal
Jump to navigation Jump to search
alt text
CEPHRC

The Centre Of Excellence For Protection Of Human Rights In Cyberspace (CEPHRC) is an exclusive techno-legal centre dedicated to safeguarding human rights in the digital domain. Established by Sovereign P4LO and PTLB, CEPHRC addresses emerging challenges at the intersection of technology, law, and human rights, including AI, blockchain, online dispute resolution, surveillance, and global health policies. It publishes in-depth analyses and retrospectives on topics like international trade disputes, validated conspiracy theories, COVID-19 irregularities, and central bank digital currencies.

Mission and Focus

CEPHRC's mission is to protect human rights in cyberspace through techno-legal research and advocacy. It emphasizes ethical technology use, legal accountability, and exposure of systemic abuses. Key areas include conflict of laws in digital spaces, human rights protection in the digital age, and critiques of global events like the COVID-19 response. The centre also explores blockchain and AI in trade ODR and provides archival evidence for its claims.

In collaboration with platforms like ODR India, CEPHRC contributes to dispute resolution frameworks and trade portals, encouraging expert involvement. It draws on international legal instruments, such as the Rome Statute, UDHR, ICCPR, and UNCRC, to advocate against violations.

Validated Conspiracy Theories

CEPHRC examines how dismissed "conspiracy theories" often become documented truths, highlighting instances of government, corporate, and international deceptions. This includes analyses of CIA operations, propaganda tactics, and digital controls. The centre counters narratives through evidence-based retrospectives and wiretap exposures.

The following table summarizes key validated conspiracy theories discussed in CEPHRC publications.

Category Event Historical Context Initial Promotion as Science Emerging Evidence and Sources Current Status and Impacts
Government Experiments MKUltra 1953–1973 CIA mind control program using LSD and hypnosis on unwitting subjects Promoted as scientific research for national security and psychological advancement Church Committee hearings (1975); declassified documents; whistleblower testimonies ThreadReaderApp Confirmed; led to ethical reforms in human experimentation, compensation for victims, and restrictions on intelligence agencies
False Flags Operation Northwoods 1962 U.S. military proposal for staged attacks to justify Cuba invasion Presented as strategic military planning under scientific risk assessment Declassified in 1997 via FOIA; ABC News reports Rejected by Kennedy; exposed U.S. willingness for deception, influencing public distrust in government operations
Corporate/Health Big Tobacco Cover-Up 1950s–1990s tobacco industry denial of smoking health risks Marketed as harmless habit backed by sponsored "scientific" studies 1998 Master Settlement Agreement; internal memos leaked; CDC confirmations Nature Confirmed; resulted in billions in settlements, public health campaigns, and global smoking regulations
Surveillance COINTELPRO 1956–1971 FBI program to disrupt civil rights and political groups Framed as lawful intelligence gathering for national security Exposed in 1971 burglary of FBI office; Senate investigations; declassified files Operation Mockingbird Confirmed; led to FBI reforms, privacy laws, and ongoing debates on surveillance
Recent Health Crises COVID-19 Lab Leak 2020–2023 origin of SARS-CoV-2 from Wuhan lab Initially dismissed as conspiracy, promoted natural origin as scientific consensus FBI and DOE assessments (2023); whistleblower reports; genomic studies Age-Stratified Review JAMA Widely accepted as plausible; impacted U.S.-China relations, lab safety protocols, and pandemic preparedness
International/Elite Epstein Network 1990s–2019 sex trafficking ring involving elites Downplayed as isolated crimes, not a networked conspiracy 2024 court documents unsealed; survivor testimonies; media investigations Confirmed; led to arrests, suicides, and calls for accountability in elite circles
Health Policy Irregularities COVID-19 Plandemic 2020–2025 global response including injections and diagnostics Promoted as evidence-based public health science WHO Archival threads Seminal Thread; meta-analyses on efficacy Bayesian Review; excess mortality data National Scandal Overall Mortality Ongoing scrutiny; legal challenges Trump v. CASA; calls for ICC investigations under Nuremberg Code Nuremberg Debates and Rome Statute ICC Resources
Diagnostic Flaws RT-PCR Irregularities in COVID-19 2020–2025 high false positives in testing Sold as gold-standard scientific diagnostic tool Persistent Positives Contamination reports CDC Kits; cycle threshold analyses Ct Trends False Positives Acknowledged flaws; revised guidelines, impacted case counts and policy decisions
Treatment Suppression Ivermectin Suppression 2020–2025 blocking of alternative treatments Mainstream science dismissed as unproven despite early studies WHO Nods Meta-analyses showing efficacy Systematic Review Repurposing Meta PRINCIPLE; protocols FLCCC Borody Protocol Debated; some countries adopted, led to lawsuits and ethical debates on off-label use

The table incorporates evidence from various sources, including adverse event databases, network analyses, and cardiopulmonary studies. Legal contexts draw from U.S. codes, FDA updates, court cases, Jacobson, RFRA, Wilkins, Article 21, Epidemic Act.

COVID-19 Retrospective Analyses

CEPHRC provides medico-legal retrospectives on the COVID-19 response, critiquing experimental injections, diagnostic flaws, and excess mortality. Key resources include archival PDFs and thread analyses. Scientific evidence covers efficacy, higher dose, mortality studies, 21-Country Analysis, and ethical breaches, Hippocratic Oath.

Legal implications reference international plans ICC Plan ASP Regrets Key Developments Universality, sanctions UN Sanctions, and debates Holocaust Letter Global Opinions Legal Underpinnings Explaining Mandates RFK Challenges.

Additional analyses cover executive responses, containment, pendency, lockdown semiotics, mental health orders, digital rights, and Helsinki principles. Video resources include YouTube Analysis.

Reference Links

Categories

Retrieved from "https://odrindia.in/wiki/index.php?title=CEPHRC&oldid=97"